TIME 내용

TIME
Bacteriophage
등록일
2020-06-28

A bacteriophage (/bækˈtɪərioʊfeɪdʒ/), also known informally as a phage (/feɪdʒ/), is a virus that infects and replicates within bacteria and archaea. The term was derived from "bacteria" and the Greek φαγεῖν (phagein), meaning "to devour". Bacteriophages are composed of proteins that encapsulate a DNA or RNA genome, and may have structures that are either simple or elaborate. Their genomes may encode as few as four genes (e.g. MS2) and as many as hundreds of genes. Phages replicate within the bacterium following the injection of their genome into its cytoplasm.

Bacteriophages are among the most common and diverse entities in the biosphere.[1] Bacteriophages are ubiquitous viruses, found wherever bacteria exist. It is estimated there are more than 1031 bacteriophages on the planet, more than every other organism on Earth, including bacteria, combined.[2] One of the densest natural sources for phages and other viruses is seawater, where up to 9x108 virions per millilitre have been found in microbial mats at the surface,[3] and up to 70% of marine bacteria may be infected by phages.[4]

Phages have been used since the late 20th century as an alternative to antibiotics in the former Soviet Union and Central Europe, as well as in France.[5][6] They are seen as a possible therapy against multi-drug-resistant strains of many bacteria (see phage therapy).[7] On the other hand, phages of Inoviridae have been shown to complicate biofilms involved in pneumonia and cystic fibrosis and to shelter the bacteria from drugs meant to eradicate disease, thus promoting persistent infection.[8]

Classification

Bacteriophages occur abundantly in the biosphere, with different genomes, and lifestyles. Phages are classified by the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (ICTV) according to morphology and nucleic acid.

It has been suggested that members of Picobirnaviridae infect bacteria, but not mammals.[10]

Another proposed family is "Autolykiviridae" (dsDNA).[11]

History

In 1896, Ernest Hanbury Hankin reported that something in the waters of the Ganges and Yamuna rivers in India had a marked antibacterial action against cholera and it could pass through a very fine porcelain filter.[12] In 1915, British bacteriologist Frederick Twort, superintendent of the Brown Institution of London, discovered a small agent that infected and killed bacteria. He believed the agent must be one of the following:

1. a stage in the life cycle of the bacteria
2. an enzyme produced by the bacteria themselves, or
3. a virus that grew on and destroyed the bacteria[13]

Twort's research was interrupted by the onset of World War I, as well as a shortage of funding and the discoveries of antibiotics.

Independently, French-Canadian microbiologist Félix d'Hérelle, working at the Pasteur Institute in Paris, announced on 3 September 1917, that he had discovered "an invisible, antagonistic microbe of the dysentery bacillus". For d’Hérelle, there was no question as to the nature of his discovery: "In a flash I had understood: what caused my clear spots was in fact an invisible microbe … a virus parasitic on bacteria."[14] D'Hérelle called the virus a bacteriophage, a bacteria-eater (from the Greek phagein meaning "to devour"). He also recorded a dramatic account of a man suffering from dysentery who was restored to good health by the bacteriophages.[15] It was D'Herelle who conducted much research into bacteriophages and introduced the concept of phage therapy.[16]

More than a half a century later, in 1969, Max Delbrück, Alfred Hershey, and Salvador Luria were awarded the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for their discoveries of the replication of viruses and their genetic structure.[17]

Uses Phage therapy

Phages were discovered to be antibacterial agents and were used in the former Soviet Republic of Georgia (pioneered there by Giorgi Eliava with help from the co-discoverer of bacteriophages, Félix d'Herelle) during the 1920s and 1930s for treating bacterial infections. They had widespread use, including treatment of soldiers in the Red Army. However, they were abandoned for general use in the West for several reasons:

1. Antibiotics were discovered and marketed widely. They were easier to make, store, and to prescribe.
2. Medical trials of phages were carried out, but a basic lack of understanding raised questions about the validity of these trials.[18]
3. Publication of research in the Soviet Union was mainly in the Russian or Georgian languages and for many years, was not followed internationally.

The use of phages has continued since the end of the Cold War in Russia,[19] Georgia and elsewhere in Central and Eastern Europe. The first regulated, randomized, double-blind clinical trial was reported in the Journal of Wound Care in June 2009, which evaluated the safety and efficacy of a bacteriophage cocktail to treat infected venous ulcers of the leg in human patients.[20] The FDA approved the study as a Phase I clinical trial. The study's results demonstrated the safety of therapeutic application of bacteriophages, but did not show efficacy. The authors explained that the use of certain chemicals that are part of standard wound care (e.g. lactoferrin or silver) may have interfered with bacteriophage viability.[20] Shortly after that, another controlled clinical trial in Western Europe (treatment of ear infections caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa) was reported in the journal Clinical Otolaryngology in August 2009.[21] The study concludes that bacteriophage preparations were safe and effective for treatment of chronic ear infections in humans. Additionally, there have been numerous animal and other experimental clinical trials evaluating the efficacy of bacteriophages for various diseases, such as infected burns and wounds, and cystic fibrosis associated lung infections, among others.[21]

Meanwhile, bacteriophage researchers have been developing engineered viruses to overcome antibiotic resistance, and engineering the phage genes responsible for coding enzymes that degrade the biofilm matrix, phage structural proteins, and the enzymes responsible for lysis of the bacterial cell wall.[3][4][5] There have been results showing that T4 phages that are small in size and short-tailed, can be helpful in detecting E.coli in the human body.[22]

Therapeutic efficacy of a phage cocktail was evaluated in a mice model with nasal infection of multidrug-resistant (MDR) A. baumannii. Mice treated with the phage cocktail showed a 2.3-fold higher survival rate than those untreated in seven days post infection.[23] In 2017 a patient with a pancreas compromised by MDR A. baumannii was put on several antibiotics, despite this the patient's health continued to deteriorate during a four-month period. Without effective antibiotics the patient was subjected to phage therapy using a phage cocktail containing nine different phages that had been demonstrated to be effective against MDR A. baumannii. Once on this therapy the patient's downward clinical trajectory reversed, and returned to health.[24]

D'Herelle "quickly learned that bacteriophages are found wherever bacteria thrive: in sewers, in rivers that catch waste runoff from pipes, and in the stools of convalescent patients."[25] This includes rivers traditionally thought to have healing powers, including India's Ganges River.[26]

Other

Food industry – Since 2006, the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) have approved several bacteriophage products. LMP-102 (Intralytix) was approved for treating ready-to-eat (RTE) poultry and meat products. In that same year, the FDA approved LISTEX (developed and produced by Micreos) using bacteriophages on cheese to kill Listeria monocytogenes bacteria, in order to give them generally recognized as safe (GRAS) status.[27] In July 2007, the same bacteriophage were approved for use on all food products.[28] In 2011 USDA confirmed that LISTEX is a clean label processing aid and is included in USDA.[29] Research in the field of food safety is continuing to see if lytic phages are a viable option to control other food-borne pathogens in various food products.

Dairy industry – Bacteriophages present in the environment can cause fermentation failures of cheese starter cultures. In order to avoid this, mixed-strain starter cultures and culture rotation regimes can be used.[30]

Diagnostics – In 2011, the FDA cleared the first bacteriophage-based product for in vitro diagnostic use.[31] The KeyPath MRSA/MSSA Blood Culture Test uses a cocktail of bacteriophage to detect Staphylococcus aureus in positive blood cultures and determine methicillin resistance or susceptibility. The test returns results in about five hours, compared to two to three days for standard microbial identification and susceptibility test methods. It was the first accelerated antibiotic-susceptibility test approved by the FDA.[32]

Counteracting bioweapons and toxins – Government agencies in the West have for several years been looking to Georgia and the former Soviet Union for help with exploiting phages for counteracting bioweapons and toxins, such as anthrax and botulism.[33] Developments are continuing among research groups in the U.S. Other uses include spray application in horticulture for protecting plants and vegetable produce from decay and the spread of bacterial disease. Other applications for bacteriophages are as biocides for environmental surfaces, e.g., in hospitals, and as preventative treatments for catheters and medical devices before use in clinical settings. The technology for phages to be applied to dry surfaces, e.g., uniforms, curtains, or even sutures for surgery now exists. Clinical trials reported in Clinical Otolaryngology[21] show success in veterinary treatment of pet dogs with otitis.

The SEPTIC bacterium sensing and identification method uses the ion emission and its dynamics during phage infection and offers high specificity and speed for detection.[34]

Phage display is a different use of phages involving a library of phages with a variable peptide linked to a surface protein. Each phage genome encodes the variant of the protein displayed on its surface (hence the name), providing a link between the peptide variant and its encoding gene. Variant phages from the library may be selected through their binding affinity to an immobilized molecule (e.g., botulism toxin) to neutralize it. The bound, selected phages can be multiplied by reinfecting a susceptible bacterial strain, thus allowing them to retrieve the peptides encoded in them for further study.[35]

Antimicrobial drug discovery – Phage proteins often have antimicrobial activity and may serve as leads for peptidomimetics, i.e. drugs that mimic peptides.[36] Phage-ligand technology makes use of phage proteins for various applications, such as binding of bacteria and bacterial components (e.g. endotoxin) and lysis of bacteria.[37]

Basic research – Bacteriophages are important model organisms for studying principles of evolution and ecology.[38]

Replication

Bacteriophages may have a lytic cycle or a lysogenic cycle. With lytic phages such as the T4 phage, bacterial cells are broken open (lysed) and destroyed after immediate replication of the virion. As soon as the cell is destroyed, the phage progeny can find new hosts to infect. Lytic phages are more suitable for phage therapy. Some lytic phages undergo a phenomenon known as lysis inhibition, where completed phage progeny will not immediately lyse out of the cell if extracellular phage concentrations are high. This mechanism is not identical to that of temperate phage going dormant and usually, is temporary.

In contrast, the lysogenic cycle does not result in immediate lysing of the host cell. Those phages able to undergo lysogeny are known as temperate phages. Their viral genome will integrate with host DNA and replicate along with it, relatively harmlessly, or may even become established as a plasmid. The virus remains dormant until host conditions deteriorate, perhaps due to depletion of nutrients, then, the endogenous phages (known as prophages) become active. At this point they initiate the reproductive cycle, resulting in lysis of the host cell. As the lysogenic cycle allows the host cell to continue to survive and reproduce, the virus is replicated in all offspring of the cell. An example of a bacteriophage known to follow the lysogenic cycle and the lytic cycle is the phage lambda of E. coli.[39]

Sometimes prophages may provide benefits to the host bacterium while they are dormant by adding new functions to the bacterial genome, in a phenomenon called lysogenic conversion. Examples are the conversion of harmless strains of Corynebacterium diphtheriae or Vibrio cholerae by bacteriophages, to highly virulent ones that cause diphtheria or cholera, respectively.[40][41] Strategies to combat certain bacterial infections by targeting these toxin-encoding prophages have been proposed.[42]

Attachment and penetration

Bacterial cells are protected by a cell wall of polysaccharides, which are important virulence factors protecting bacterial cells against both immune host defenses and antibiotics.[43] To enter a host cell, bacteriophages attach to specific receptors on the surface of bacteria, including lipopolysaccharides, teichoic acids, proteins, or even flagella. This specificity means a bacteriophage can infect only certain bacteria bearing receptors to which they can bind, which in turn, determines the phage's host range. Polysaccharide-degrading enzymes, like endolysins are virion-associated proteins to enzymatically degrade the capsular outer layer of their hosts, at the initial step of a tightly programmed phage infection process. Host growth conditions also influence the ability of the phage to attach and invade them.[44] As phage virions do not move independently, they must rely on random encounters with the correct receptors when in solution, such as blood, lymphatic circulation, irrigation, soil water, etc.

Myovirus bacteriophages use a hypodermic syringe-like motion to inject their genetic material into the cell. After contacting the appropriate receptor, the tail fibers flex to bring the base plate closer to the surface of the cell. This is known as reversible binding. Once attached completely, irreversible binding is initiated and the tail contracts, possibly with the help of ATP, present in the tail,[4] injecting genetic material through the bacterial membrane.[45] The injection is accomplished through a sort of bending motion in the shaft by going to the side, contracting closer to the cell and pushing back up. Podoviruses lack an elongated tail sheath like that of a myovirus, so instead, they use their small, tooth-like tail fibers enzymatically to degrade a portion of the cell membrane before inserting their genetic material.

Synthesis of proteins and nucleic acid

Within minutes, bacterial ribosomes start translating viral mRNA into protein. For RNA-based phages, RNA replicase is synthesized early in the process. Proteins modify the bacterial RNA polymerase so it preferentially transcribes viral mRNA. The host's normal synthesis of proteins and nucleic acids is disrupted, and it is forced to manufacture viral products instead. These products go on to become part of new virions within the cell, helper proteins that contribute to the assemblage of new virions, or proteins involved in cell lysis. In 1972, Walter Fiers (University of Ghent, Belgium) was the first to establish the complete nucleotide sequence of a gene and in 1976, of the viral genome of bacteriophage MS2.[46] Some dsDNA bacteriophages encode ribosomal proteins, which are thought to modulate protein translation during phage infection.[47]

Virion assembly

In the case of the T4 phage, the construction of new virus particles involves the assistance of helper proteins. The base plates are assembled first, with the tails being built upon them afterward. The head capsids, constructed separately, will spontaneously assemble with the tails. The DNA is packed efficiently within the heads. The whole process takes about 15 minutes.

Release of virions

Phages may be released via cell lysis, by extrusion, or, in a few cases, by budding. Lysis, by tailed phages, is achieved by an enzyme called endolysin, which attacks and breaks down the cell wall peptidoglycan. An altogether different phage type, the filamentous phage, make the host cell continually secrete new virus particles. Released virions are described as free, and, unless defective, are capable of infecting a new bacterium. Budding is associated with certain Mycoplasma phages. In contrast to virion release, phages displaying a lysogenic cycle do not kill the host but, rather, become long-term residents as prophage.

Communication

Research in 2017 revealed that the bacteriophage Φ3T makes a short viral protein that signals other bacteriophages to lie dormant instead of killing the host bacterium. Arbitrium is the name given to this protein by the researchers who discovered it.[48][49]

Genome structure

Given the millions of different phages in the environment, phage genomes come in a variety of forms and sizes. RNA phage such as MS2 have the smallest genomes, of only a few kilobases. However, some DNA phage such as T4 may have large genomes with hundreds of genes; the size and shape of the capsid varies along with the size of the genome.[50] The largest bacteriophage genomes reach a size of 735 kb.[51]

Bacteriophage genomes can be highly mosaic, i.e. the genome of many phage species appear to be composed of numerous individual modules. These modules may be found in other phage species in different arrangements. Mycobacteriophages, bacteriophages with mycobacterial hosts, have provided excellent examples of this mosaicism. In these mycobacteriophages, genetic assortment may be the result of repeated instances of site-specific recombination and illegitimate recombination (the result of phage genome acquisition of bacterial host genetic sequences).[52] Evolutionary mechanisms shaping the genomes of bacterial viruses vary between different families and depend upon the type of the nucleic acid, characteristics of the virion structure, as well as the mode of the viral life cycle.[53]

Systems biology

Phages often have dramatic effects on their hosts. As a consequence, the transcription pattern of the infected bacterium may change considerably. For instance, infection of Pseudomonas aeruginosa by the temperate phage PaP3 changed the expression of 38% (2160/5633) of its host's genes. Many of these effects are probably indirect, hence the challenge becomes to identify the direct interactions among bacteria and phage.[54]

Several attempts have been made to map protein–protein interactions among phage and their host. For instance, bacteriophage lambda was found to interact with its host, E. coli, by 31 interactions. However, a large-scale study revealed 62 interactions, most of which were new. Again, the significance of many of these interactions remains unclear, but these studies suggest that there most likely are several key interactions and many indirect interactions whose role remains uncharacterized.[55]

In the environment

Metagenomics has allowed the in-water detection of bacteriophages that was not possible previously.[56]

Also, bacteriophages have been used in hydrological tracing and modelling in river systems, especially where surface water and groundwater interactions occur. The use of phages is preferred to the more conventional dye marker because they are significantly less absorbed when passing through ground waters and they are readily detected at very low concentrations.[57] Non-polluted water may contain approximately 2×108 bacteriophages per ml.[58]

Bacteriophages are thought to contribute extensively to horizontal gene transfer in natural environments, principally via transduction, but also via transformation.[59] Metagenomics-based studies also have revealed that viromes from a variety of environments harbor antibiotic-resistance genes, including those that could confer multidrug resistance.[60]

Bacteriophages and Covid-19

In light of the novel coronavirus, scientists and researchers from all over the globe have been looking at traditional and non-traditional methods to develop a vaccine, some have led towards bacteriophages and Covid-19. Specifically in using bacteriophages to develop vaccines against the coronavirus.

Bacteriophage DNA-based nasal spray

At the University of Waterloo in Canada, researchers are in the process of developing a nasal DNA-based vaccine. The idea behind this vaccine is to stimulate an immune response in the nasal cavity and targeted cells in the respiratory tract. This will then trigger the production of a virus-like particle (VLP) that will induce an immune response. The VLP would attach itself onto the location which the Covid-19 would normally bind to, resulting in the limitation of sites for potential transmission.

Although the VLP will visually look similar to the SARS-CoV-2 in structure, it will be harmless. The similarity will help stimulate the body’s natural immune response against viral infection, which in return will help it battle against the coronavirus. Such an approach would help the body build natural immunity against the coronavirus and mitigate the severity of infections, which means that such a product would not only act as a vaccine but can also be used therapeutic.

Professor Roderick Slavcev says that once the DNA-based vaccine is complete, it can be administered using a nasal spray, that will deliver the medication which will help immunize and decrease the Covid-19 infections. Professor Slavcev has teamed up together with Emmanuel Ho, Professor at the School of Pharmacy, and Marc Aucoin, Professor of chemical engineering, those team will be designing the nanomedication itself, that will be delivered via nasal spray.

Bacteriophage capsid

Researchers from the Leibniz-Forschungsinstitut für Molekulare Pharmakologie (FMP), Freie Universität Berlin, Technische Universität Berlin (TU), Humboldt-Universität (HU), the Robert Koch Institute (RKI) and Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, have chemically modified a bacteriophage capsid, that restrains a variety of viruses. During their research, it was observed that certain respiratory viruses were enveloped by the bacteriophage capsids, resulting in them become unable to infect lung cells. The results of this study are also being looked at the help battle the current situation with Covid-19.

The coronavirus, as well as other respiratory viruses, are dangerous as current antiviral medication only has a partial effect after infection. The ideal approach would be to prevent infection altogether. The research from Berlin, gives hope into such an approach, by having the phage capsid envelop the virus, leading to disabling it from infecting cells.

Professor Dr. Christian Hackenberger, Head of the Department Chemical Biology at the Leibniz-Forschungsinstitut für Molekulare Pharmakologie (FMP) and Leibniz Humboldt Professor for Chemical Biology at HU Berlin explained that pre-clinical trials have shown that they were able to render both seasonal influenza viruses and avian flu viruses harmless, which their chemically modified bacteriophages. This can possibly open up a whole new world of prospects in the field of antiviral drugs.

The bacteriophage capsid inhibitor makes full use of a feature that all respiratory viruses have in common, the trivalent receptors. These receptors, referred to as hemagglutinin protein, are used to attach to the sugar molecules found on the surface of a cell, such as those of lung tissue. When infection occurs, viruses hook onto the victim’s lung cells. It is this function of attachment which had the researchers, six years prior, to question whether there was the possibility of creating an inhibitor that would bind to the trivalent receptors perfectly. What was once an idea has today become a very real possibility with the development of the Q-beta phage, produced from the E.coli bacteria at TU Berlin, which is perfectly equipped with ligands, in this case with sugar molecules to act as bait.

Dr. Daniel Lauster, a former Ph.D. student in the Group of Molecular Biophysics (HU) and now a postdoc at Freie Universität Berlin explains that the phage is not infectious and is made of 180 identical proteins that are paced identically as the trivalent receptors on the surface of the virus. This creates an ideal scenario where the virus is deceived and attaches itself to the phage, followed by being enveloped and deactivated from further infection. Professor Hackenberger believes that taking this approach, which is non-toxic, biodegradable, and non-immunogenic, can open doors to battling other viruses and possibly even bacteria.

Bacteriophages and Covid-19 – Fighting secondary bacterial infections.

No recommendations have been looked at for the use of bacteriophages in the prevention of secondary bacterial pneumonia and sepsis that occurred in some patients. The bacteria that begin to manifest during lung injury and the presence of the cytokine storm, is still a prominent problem that has not been addressed. Lytic bacteriophages against such bacterial infection when using an inhalation method would be worth exploring. In addition, any prophylactic lytic phages have immunomodulatory effects that would be helpful for the prevention of cytokine reaction from the start.

Unfortunately, in the current situation, a study using phages can currently only be placed into action in Russia and Georgia, two countries with bacteriophage production, and the use of phages in daily practice. Russia also has a lot of experience with the preventive use of phages in times of natural disasters on a large number of people. In Europe and the United States, there are questions towards the production of phage preparations, but to date, there is no relevant legislation. The recommendations of WHO towards possible approaches against the superbug, unfortunately, contain no mention of bacteriophages.

Source: Bacteriophage.news

References

[1] McGrath S and van Sinderen D (editors). (2007). Bacteriophage: Genetics and Molecular Biology (1st ed.). Caister Academic Press. ISBN 978-1-904455-14-1.

[2] "Novel Phage Therapy Saves Patient with Multidrug-Resistant Bacterial Infection". UC Health – UC San Diego. Retrieved 13 May 2018.

[3] Wommack, K. E.; Colwell, R. R. (2000). "Virioplankton: Viruses in Aquatic Ecosystems". Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews. 64 (1): 69–114. doi:10.1128/MMBR.64.1.69-114.2000. PMC 98987. PMID 10704475.

[4] Prescott, L. (1993). Microbiology, Wm. C. Brown Publishers, ISBN 0-697-01372-3

[5] BBC Horizon (1997): The Virus that Cures – Documentary about the history of phage medicine in Russia and the West

[6] Borrell, Brendan (August 2012). "Science talk: Phage factor". Scientific American. pp. 80–83.

[7] Keen, E. C. (2012). "Phage Therapy: Concept to Cure". Frontiers in Microbiology. 3: 238. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2012.00238. PMC 3400130. PMID 22833738.

[8] "Bacteria and bacteriophages collude in the formation of clinically frustrating biofilms".

[9] Elina Laanto, Sari Mäntynen, Luigi De Colibus, Jenni Marjakangas, Ashley Gillum, David I. Stuart, Janne J. Ravantti, Juha Huiskonen, Lotta-Riina Sundberg: Virus found in a boreal lake links ssDNA and dsDNA viruses. In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 114(31), July 2017, doi:10.1073/pnas.1703834114

[10] Krishnamurthy SR, Wang D (2018). "Extensive conservation of prokaryotic ribosomal binding sites in known and novel picobirnaviruses". Virology. 516: 108–114. doi:10.1016/j.virol.2018.01.006. PMID 29346073.

[11] Kathryn M. Kauffman, Fatima A. Hussain, Joy Yang, Philip Arevalo, Julia M. Brown, William K. Chang, David VanInsberghe, Joseph Elsherbini, Radhey S. Sharma, Michael B. Cutler, Libusha Kelly, Martin F. Polz: A major lineage of non-tailed dsDNA viruses as unrecognized killers of marine bacteria. In: Nature Vol. 554, pp. 118–122. January 24th, 2018. doi:10.1038/nature25474

[12] Hankin E H. (1896). "L'action bactericide des eaux de la Jumna et du Gange sur le vibrion du cholera". Annales de l'Institut Pasteur (in French). 10: 511–523.

[13] Twort, F. W. (1915). "An Investigation on the Nature of Ultra-Microscopic Viruses". The Lancet. 186 (4814): 1241–1243. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(01)20383-3.

[14] d'Hérelles, Félix (1917). "Sur un microbe invisible antagoniste des bacilles dysentériques" (PDF). Comptes Rendus de l'Académie des Sciences de Paris. 165: 373–5. Archived (PDF) from the original on 11 May 2011. Retrieved 5 September 2010.

[15] d'Hérelles, Félix (1949). "The bacteriophage" (PDF). Science News. 14: 44–59. Retrieved 5 September 2010.

[16] Keen EC (2012). "Felix d'Herelle and Our Microbial Future". Future Microbiology. 7 (12): 1337–1339. doi:10.2217/fmb.12.115. PMID 23231482.

[17] "The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine 1969". Nobel Foundation. Retrieved 28 July 2007.

[18] Kutter, Elizabeth; De Vos, Daniel; Gvasalia, Guram; Alavidze, Zemphira; Gogokhia, Lasha; Kuhl, Sarah; Abedon, Stephen (1 January 2010). "Phage Therapy in Clinical Practice: Treatment of Human Infections". Current Pharmaceutical Biotechnology. 11 (1): 69–86. doi:10.2174/138920110790725401. PMID 20214609. S2CID 31626252.

[19] Сергей Головин Бактериофаги: убийцы в роли спасителей // Наука и жизнь. – 2017. – № 6. – С. 26–33

[20] Rhoads, DD; Wolcott, RD; Kuskowski, MA; Wolcott, BM; Ward, LS; Sulakvelidze, A (June 2009). "Bacteriophage therapy of venous leg ulcers in humans: results of a phase I safety trial". Journal of Wound Care. 18 (6): 237–8, 240–3. doi:10.12968/jowc.2009.18.6.42801. PMID 19661847.

[21] Wright, A.; Hawkins, C.H.; Änggård, E.E.; Harper, D.R. (August 2009). "A controlled clinical trial of a therapeutic bacteriophage preparation in chronic otitis due to antibiotic-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa; a preliminary report of efficacy". Clinical Otolaryngology. 34 (4): 349–357. doi:10.1111/j.1749-4486.2009.01973.x. PMID 19673983.

[22] Tawil, Nancy (April 2012). "Surface plasmon resonance detection of E. coli and mathicillin-resistant S. aureus bacteriophages". PLOS Genetics. 3 (5): e78. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.0030078. PMC 1877875. PMID 17530925.

[23] Cha, Kyoungeun; Oh, Hynu K.; Jang, Jae Y.; Jo, Yunyeol; Kim, Won K.; Ha, Geon U.; Ko, Kwan S.; Myung, Heejoon (10 April 2018). "Characterization of Two Novel Bacteriophages Infecting Multidrug-Resistant (MDR) Acinetobacter baumannii and Evaluation of Their Therapeutic Efficacy in Vivo". Frontiers in Microbiology. 9: 696. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2018.00696. ISSN 1664-302X. PMC 5932359. PMID 29755420.

[24] Schooley, Robert T.; Biswas, Biswajit; Gill, Jason J.; Hernandez-Morales, Adriana; Lancaster, Jacob; Lessor, Lauren; Barr, Jeremy J.; Reed, Sharon L.; Rohwer, Forest (October 2017). "Development and Use of Personalized Bacteriophage-Based Therapeutic Cocktails To Treat a Patient with a Disseminated Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii Infection". Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 61 (10). doi:10.1128/AAC.00954-17. ISSN 0066-4804. PMC 5610518. PMID 28807909.

[25] Kuchment, Anna (2012), The Forgotten Cure: The past and future of phage therapy, Springer, p. 11, ISBN 978-1-4614-0250-3

[26] Deresinski, Stan (15 April 2009). "Bacteriophage Therapy: Exploiting Smaller Fleas" (PDF). Clinical Infectious Diseases. 48 (8): 1096–1101. doi:10.1086/597405. PMID 19275495.

[27] U.S. FDA/CFSAN: Agency Response Letter, GRAS Notice No. 000198

[28] (U.S. FDA/CFSAN: Agency Response Letter, GRAS Notice No. 000218)

[29] FSIS Directive 7120 Archived 18 October 2011 at the Wayback Machine

[30] Atamer, Zeynep; Samtlebe, Meike; Neve, Horst; J. Heller, Knut; Hinrichs, Joerg (16 July 2013). "Review: elimination of bacteriophages in whey and whey products". Frontiers in Microbiology. 4: 191. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2013.00191. PMC 3712493. PMID 23882262.

[31] FDA 510(k) Premarket Notification

[32] FDA clears first test to quickly diagnose and distinguish MRSA and MSSA. FDA (6 May 2011)

[33] Vaisman, Daria (25 May 2007) Studying anthrax in a Soviet-era lab – with Western funding. The New York Times

[34] Dobozi-King, M.; Seo, S.; Kim, J.U.; Young, R.; Cheng, M.; Kish, L.B. (2005). "Rapid detection and identification of bacteria: SEnsing of Phage-Triggered Ion Cascade (SEPTIC)" (PDF). Journal of Biological Physics and Chemistry. 5: 3–7. doi:10.4024/1050501.jbpc.05.01.

[35] Smith GP, Petrenko VA (April 1997). "Phage Display". Chem. Rev. 97 (2): 391–410. doi:10.1021/cr960065d. PMID 11848876.

[36] Liu, Jing; Dehbi, Mohammed; Moeck, Greg; Arhin, Francis; Bauda, Pascale; Bergeron, Dominique; Callejo, Mario; Ferretti, Vincent; Ha, Nhuan (February 2004). "Antimicrobial drug discovery through bacteriophage genomics". Nature Biotechnology. 22 (2): 185–191. doi:10.1038/nbt932. PMID 14716317. S2CID 9905115.

[37] Technological background Phage-ligand technology

[38] Keen, E. C. (2014). "Tradeoffs in bacteriophage life histories". Bacteriophage. 4 (1): e28365. doi:10.4161/bact.28365. PMC 3942329. PMID 24616839.

[39] Mason, Kenneth A., Jonathan B. Losos, Susan R. Singer, Peter H Raven, and George B. Johnson. (2011). Biology, p. 533. McGraw-Hill, New York. ISBN 978-0-07-893649-4.

[40] Mokrousov I (2009). "Corynebacterium diphtheriae: genome diversity, population structure and genotyping perspectives". Infection, Genetics and Evolution. 9 (1): 1–15. doi:10.1016/j.meegid.2008.09.011. PMID 19007916.

[41] Charles RC, Ryan ET (October 2011). "Cholera in the 21st century". Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases. 24 (5): 472–7. doi:10.1097/QCO.0b013e32834a88af. PMID 21799407.

[42] Keen, E. C. (December 2012). "Paradigms of pathogenesis: Targeting the mobile genetic elements of disease". Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology. 2: 161. doi:10.3389/fcimb.2012.00161. PMC 3522046. PMID 23248780.

[43] Drulis-Kawa, Zuzanna; Majkowska-Skrobek, Grazyna; MacIejewska, Barbara (2015). "Bacteriophages and Phage-Derived Proteins – Application Approaches". Current Medicinal Chemistry. 22 (14): 1757–1773. doi:10.2174/0929867322666150209152851. PMC 4468916. PMID 25666799.

[44] Gabashvili, I.; Khan, S.; Hayes, S.; Serwer, P. (1997). "Polymorphism of bacteriophage T7". Journal of Molecular Biology. 273 (3): 658–67. doi:10.1006/jmbi.1997.1353. PMID 9356254.

[45] Maghsoodi, A.; Chatterjee, A.; Andricioaei, I.; Perkins, N.C. (25 November 2019). "How the phage T4 injection machinery works including energetics, forces, and dynamic pathway". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 116 (50): 25097–25105. doi:10.1073/pnas.1909298116. ISSN 0027-8424.

[46] Fiers, W.; Contreras, R.; Duerinck, F.; Haegeman, G.; Iserentant, D.; Merregaert, J.; Min Jou, W.; Molemans, F.; Raeymaekers, A.; Van Den Berghe, A.; Volckaert, G.; Ysebaert, M. (1976). "Complete nucleotide sequence of bacteriophage MS2 RNA: primary and secondary structure of the replicase gene". Nature. 260 (5551): 500–507. Bibcode:1976Natur.260..500F. doi:10.1038/260500a0. PMID 1264203. S2CID 4289674.

[47] Mizuno, CM; Guyomar, C; Roux, S; Lavigne, R; Rodriguez-Valera, F; Sullivan, MB; Gillet, R; Forterre, P; Krupovic, M (2019). "Numerous cultivated and uncultivated viruses encode ribosomal proteins". Nature Communications. 10 (1): 752. Bibcode:2019NatCo..10..752M. doi:10.1038/s41467-019-08672-6. PMC 6375957. PMID 30765709.

[48] Callaway, Ewen (2017). "Do you speak virus? Phages caught sending chemical messages". Nature. doi:10.1038/nature.2017.21313.

[49] Erez, Zohar; Steinberger-Levy, Ida; Shamir, Maya; Doron, Shany; Stokar-Avihail, Avigail; Peleg, Yoav; Melamed, Sarah; Leavitt, Azita; Savidor, Alon; Albeck, Shira; Amitai, Gil; Sorek, Rotem (26 January 2017). "Communication between viruses guides lysis–lysogeny decisions". Nature. 541 (7638): 488–493. Bibcode:2017Natur.541..488E. doi:10.1038/nature21049. ISSN 0028-0836. PMC 5378303. PMID 28099413.

[50] Black, LW; Thomas, JA (2012). Condensed genome structure. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology. 726. pp. 469–87. doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-0980-9_21. ISBN 978-1-4614-0979-3. PMC 3559133. PMID 22297527.

[51] Al-Shayeb, Basem; Sachdeva, Rohan; Chen, Lin-Xing; Ward, Fred; Munk, Patrick; Devoto, Audra; Castelle, Cindy J.; Olm, Matthew R.; Bouma-Gregson, Keith; Amano, Yuki; He, Christine (February 2020). "Clades of huge phages from across Earth's ecosystems". Nature. 578 (7795): 425–431. doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2007-4. ISSN 1476-4687. PMC 7162821. PMID 32051592.

[52] Morris P, Marinelli LJ, Jacobs-Sera D, Hendrix RW, Hatfull GF (March 2008). "Genomic characterization of mycobacteriophage Giles: evidence for phage acquisition of host DNA by illegitimate recombination". Journal of Bacteriology. 190 (6): 2172–82. doi:10.1128/JB.01657-07. PMC 2258872. PMID 18178732.

[53] Krupovic M, Prangishvili D, Hendrix RW, Bamford DH (December 2011). "Genomics of bacterial and archaeal viruses: dynamics within the prokaryotic virosphere". Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews. 75 (4): 610–35. doi:10.1128/MMBR.00011-11. PMC 3232739. PMID 22126996.

[54] Zhao X, Chen C, Shen W, Huang G, Le S, Lu S, Li M, Zhao Y, Wang J, Rao X, Li G, Shen M, Guo K, Yang Y, Tan Y, Hu F (2016). "Global Transcriptomic Analysis of Interactions between Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Bacteriophage PaP3". Sci Rep. 6: 19237. Bibcode:2016NatSR...619237Z. doi:10.1038/srep19237. PMC 4707531. PMID 26750429.

[55] Blasche S, Wuchty S, Rajagopala SV, Uetz P (2013). "The protein interaction network of bacteriophage lambda with its host, Escherichia coli". J. Virol. 87 (23): 12745–55. doi:10.1128/JVI.02495-13. PMC 3838138. PMID 24049175.

[56] Breitbart M, Salamon P, Andresen B, Mahaffy JM, Segall AM, Mead D, Azam F, Rohwer F (October 2002). "Genomic analysis of uncultured marine viral communities". Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 99 (22): 14250–5. Bibcode:2002PNAS...9914250B. doi:10.1073/pnas.202488399. PMC 137870. PMID 12384570.

[57] Martin, C. (1988). "The Application of Bacteriophage Tracer Techniques in South West Water". Water and Environment Journal. 2 (6): 638–642. doi:10.1111/j.1747-6593.1988.tb01352.x.

[58] Bergh, O (1989). "High abundance of viruses found in aquatic environments". Nature. 340 (6233): 467–468. Bibcode:1989Natur.340..467B. doi:10.1038/340467a0. PMID 2755508. S2CID 4271861.

[59] Keen, Eric C.; Bliskovsky, Valery V.; Malagon, Francisco; Baker, James D.; Prince, Jeffrey S.; Klaus, James S.; Adhya, Sankar L.; Groisman, Eduardo A. (2017). "Novel "Superspreader" Bacteriophages Promote Horizontal Gene Transfer by Transformation". mBio. 8 (1): e02115–16. doi:10.1128/mBio.02115-16. PMC 5241400. PMID 28096488.

[60] Lekunberri, Itziar; Subirats, Jessica; Borrego, Carles M.; Balcazar, Jose L. (2017). "Exploring the contribution of bacteriophages to antibiotic resistance". Environmental Pollution. 220 (Pt B): 981–984. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2016.11.059. hdl:10256/14115. PMID 27890586.

噬菌体

噬菌体(phage)是侵袭细菌的病毒,也是赋予宿主菌生物学性状的遗传物质。噬菌体必须在活菌内寄生,有严格的宿主特异性,其取决于噬菌体吸附器官和受体菌表面受体的分子结构和互补性。噬菌体是病毒中最为普遍和分布最广的群体。通常在一些充满细菌群落的地方,如:泥土、动物的肠道里,都可以找到噬菌体。

介绍

噬菌体(bacteriophage, phage)是感染细菌、真菌、藻类 、放线菌或螺旋体等微生物的病毒的总称,因部分能引起宿主菌的裂解,故称为噬菌体。本世纪初在葡萄球菌和志贺菌中首先发现。作为病毒的一种,噬菌体具有病毒的一些特性:个体微小;不具有完整细胞结构;只含有单一核酸。可视为一种“捕食”细菌的生物。噬菌体基因组含有许多个基因,但所有已知的噬菌体都是细菌细胞中利用细菌的核糖体、蛋白质合成时所需的各种因子、各种氨基酸和能量产生系统来实现其自身的生长和增殖。一旦离开了宿主细胞,噬菌体既不能生长,也不能复制 。噬菌体是病毒的一种,其特别之处是专以细菌为宿主,较为人知的噬菌体是以大肠杆菌为寄主的T2噬菌体。跟别的病毒一样,噬菌体只是一团由蛋白质外壳包裹的遗传物质,大部分噬菌体还长有“尾巴”,用来将遗传物质注入宿主体内。噬菌体是一种普遍存在的生物体,而且经常都伴随着细菌。通常在一些充满细菌群落的地方,如:泥土、动物的内脏里,都可以找到噬菌体的踪影。世上蕴含最丰富噬菌体的地方就是海水 。

生物学性状

噬菌体的体积小,其形态有蝌蚪形、微球形和细杆形,以蝌蚪形多见。噬菌体是由核酸和蛋白质构成。蛋白质起着保护核酸的作用,并决定噬菌体的外形和表面特征。其核酸只有一种类型,即DNA或RNA,双链或单链,环状或线状。

种类 蛋白质结构

无尾部结构的二十面体:这种噬菌体为一个二十面体,外表由规律排列的蛋白亚单位——衣壳组成,核酸则被包裹在内部。

有尾部结构的二十面体:这种噬菌体除了一个二十面体的头部外,还有由一个中空的针状结构及外鞘组成的尾部,以及尾丝和尾针组成的基部。

线状体:这种噬菌体呈线状,没有明显的头部结构,而是由壳粒组成的盘旋状结构。

迄今已知的噬菌体大多数是有尾部结构的二十面体,这是因为正多面体是多面体里最简单的结构,搭建起来最容易,所以病毒喜欢采用正多面体的结构。而正多面体一共又只有五种,分别是正4, 6, 8, 12, 20面体,其中正20面体是最接近球形的,也就是在体积相同的情况下,需要更少的材料,更为节省。

核酸特点

ss RNA:噬菌体中所含的核酸是单链RNA。

ds RNA:噬菌体中所含的核酸是双链RNA。

ss DNA:噬菌体中所含的核酸是单链DNA。

ds DNA:噬菌体中所含的核酸是双链DNA。

繁殖特点

1.毒性噬菌体

指在宿主菌体内复制增殖,产生许多子代噬菌体,并最终裂解细菌。毒性噬菌体的增殖方式是复制,其增殖过程经历吸附穿入、生物合成和成熟释放3个阶段。

进入菌细胞内的噬菌体核酸首先经早期转录产生早期蛋白质,并复制子代核酸,再进行晚期转录产生噬菌体的结构蛋白。子代噬菌体达到一定数量时,由于噬菌体合成酶类的溶解,菌细胞突然裂解,释放出的噬菌体再感染其他敏感细菌。

2.温和噬菌体

感染宿主菌后并不增殖。其基因整合于细菌染色体上,即前噬菌体,随细菌染色体的复制而复制,并随细菌分裂而分配至子代细菌的染色体中。温和噬菌体有溶原性周期和溶菌性周期,可偶尔自发地或在某些理化或生物因素地影响下,整合的前噬菌体脱离宿主菌染色体,进入溶菌性周期导致细菌裂解,并产生新的成熟噬菌体。

发现历史

初期:1915年-1940年

1915年,弗德里克• 特沃特(Frederick W.Twort)担任伦敦布朗研究所所长。特沃特在研究中力图寻找用于天花疫苗的痘苗病毒(vaccina virus)的变异株(variant ) ,这种变异株可能在活细胞外介质中复制。他在一项试验中将一部分天花疫苗接种给一个含营养琼脂的培养盘。虽然这种病毒未能复制,但是细菌污染物在琼脂盘中生长很快。特沃特继续进行他的培养并注意到,一些细菌菌落显示出“带水的样子”(即变得比较透明)。这样的菌落做进一步培养时也不再能复制(即细菌被杀死)。特沃特把这种现象称为透明转化(glassy transformation)。他接着证明用透明转化原理感染一个正常的细菌菌落会把这种细菌杀死。这种透明实体很容易通过一个陶瓷过滤器,可被稀释一百万倍,当放在新鲜细菌上的时候就会恢复它的实力,或者说滴度。

特沃特发表了一篇描述这种现象的短文,认为对他所观察的结果的解释是存在一种细菌病毒。由于服役于第一次世界大战,特沃特的研究中断了。返回伦敦后,他没有继续进行这项研究因此在这个领域没有作出进一步的贡献。

与此同时,加拿大医学细菌学家费利克斯• 德赫雷尔(Felix d’Herelle)当时正在巴黎的巴斯德研究所工作。1915年8 月,法国的一个骑兵中队驻扎在巴黎郊外的梅宗-勒菲特(Maisons-Lafitte) ,一场严重的志贺氏杆菌引发的痢疾对整个部队造成了毁灭性的打击。德赫雷尔对患者的粪便进行过滤,很快从过滤的乳状液中分离出痢疾杆菌,并且加以培养。细菌不断生长,复盖了培养皿的表面。德赫雷尔偶然观察到清楚的圆点,上面没有长出任何细菌。他把这些东西称为乳样斑(taches vierges),或称为噬斑(plaques)。德赫雷尔跟踪观察一名患者的整个感染过程,观察何时细菌最多,斑点何时出现。有意思的是,患者的病情在感染后的第四天开始好转。

德赫雷尔把这些病毒(virus )称为噬菌体(bateriophage) ,紧接着他发明了病毒学研究领域的方法。他将噬斑进行有限的稀释,测定病毒的浓度。他的推论是出现斑点表明病毒为颗粒或称为小体(corpuscular)。德赫雷尔在研究中还证明病毒感染的第一步是病原体附着(吸附)宿主细胞。他通过把病毒与宿主细胞混合后共沉淀证明了这一点。(他还证明,上清中不存在这种病毒)一种病毒的附着只是在细菌对与它混合的病毒敏感时才出现,这表明了一种病毒对宿主细胞的吸附有特定的范围。他还用很清楚的现代术语描述了细胞溶菌(lysis )的释放。德赫雷尔在许多方面是现代病毒学原理的创始人之一。

到1921 年,越来越多的溶原性菌株(lysogenic bacterial strain) 被分离,在一些实验中已经不可能把病毒与它的宿主分开。这使布鲁塞尔巴斯德研究所的朱勒斯• 博尔德特(Jules Bordet)认为,德赫雷尔描述的传染性病原体只不过是一种促进自身繁殖的细菌酶(bacterial enzyme)。虽然这是一种错误的结论,但是它相当接近于朊病毒(prion)结构和复制的看法。

在20 世纪20-30 年代,德赫雷尔重点探索他的研究成果在医学上的应用,但是毫无成果。当时进行的基础研究常常受该领域个别科学家的强烈个性所产生的解释的影响。显然有许多不同的噬菌体,一些为溶菌性(lytic)而另一些则是溶原性(lysogenic ) ,但是它们之间的相互关系仍然定义不明确。这个时期的重要发现是马克斯• 施莱辛格,他证明纯化的噬菌体最大直径(linear dimension )0.1 微米,质量大约4x10克,它们由蛋白质和DNA 构成,比例大体上相等。1936 年那时没有任何人清楚地知道如何利用这种观察结果,但是,它在随后的20 年里产生了重大影响。

现代:1938 年-1970 年

马克斯• 德尔布吕克(Max Delbruck )是吉廷根大学(Gittinge)培养出来的物理学家。他的第一份工作是在柏林威廉化学研究所,在那里他与一些研究人员积极地讨论量子物理与遗传学的关系。德尔布吕克对这个领域的兴趣使他发明了一种基因的量子机械模型(guantum mechanical model of gene )。1937 年,他申请并获得了在加利福尼亚理工学院学习的奖学金。一到加利福尼亚理工学院他就开始与另一位研究员埃默里• 埃利斯(Emory Ellis)合作。埃利斯当时正在研究一组噬菌体-T2 、T4 、T6 ( T-偶数噬菌体)。德尔布吕克很快认识到这些病毒适合研究病毒复制。这些噬菌体是探索遗传信息如何决定一种生物体的结构和功能的一个途径。从一开始,这些病毒就被视为了解癌症病毒,甚至了解精子如何使卵子受精并发育为一种新生物体的典型系统。埃利克和德尔布吕克设计出一步生长曲线试验。在这项试验中,一种受感染的细菌经过半个小时的潜伏期(latent period)或称为隐蔽期(eclipse period )之后释放了大量噬菌体。这项试验给潜伏期下了定义,即病毒失去传染性的时候。这成为这个噬菌体研究小组的试验范例。

第二次世界大战爆发后,德尔布吕克留在美国(在范德比尔特大学),见到了意大利难民萨尔瓦多•卢里亚(Salvador E . Luria )。卢里亚逃到美国避难,当时在纽约州哥伦比亚大学研究T1和T2噬菌体。他们是1940 年12 月28 日在费城举行的一次会议上见面的,并在随后的两天里策划在哥伦比亚大学的试验。两位科学家将招聘和领导越来越多的研究人员重点研究利用细菌病毒作为了解生命进程的一个模型。对他们的成功起关键作用的是1941 年夏天他们应邀到冷泉港实验室做试验。就这样一位德国物理学家和一位意大利遗传学家在二战期间一直进行合作,周游美国招聘新一代的生物学家,后来这些人被称为噬菌体研究小组。

此后不久,新泽西州普林斯顿RCA 实验室的电子显微学家汤姆• 安德森(Tom Anderson )见到了德尔布吕克。到1942 年3 月,他们第一次获得了噬菌体的清晰照片。大约同时,这些噬菌体变异株第一次被分离和鉴定。到1946 年,冷泉港实验室开设了第一门噬菌体课程,1947 年3 月,第一次噬菌体会议有8 人出席。分子生物学就是从这些缓慢的开端中发展起来的。这门科学的重点是研究细菌宿主及其病毒。

随后的25 年(1950 年至1975 年)是用噬菌体进行病毒学研究硕果累累的时期。数百名病毒学家发表了数千篇论文,主要涉及三个领域:(a)用T-偶数噬菌体进行的大肠杆菌溶菌性感染研究;(b) 利用λ噬菌体进行的溶原性研究,以及(c)几种独特噬菌体的复制和特性研究,例如ФX174 (单链环状DNA )、RNA 噬菌体、T7 等。它们为现代分子病毒学和生物学奠定了基础。本文不可能一一介绍所有这些科学文献,只能提及一些有选择的重点。

到1947年至1948年,用生物化学方法研究噬菌体感染细胞在潜伏期发生的变化开始盛行。西摩•科恩(Seymour Cohen )最初曾在哥伦比亚大学与欧文• 查格夫(Erwin Chargaff)一道研究脂质和核酸,随后又与温德尔• 斯坦利研究烟草花叶病毒RNA ,1946年在冷泉港实验室主修德尔布吕克的噬菌体课程。他利用比色法(colorimetric analisis )研究被噬菌体感染的细胞中DNA 和RNA 水平的影响。这些研究表明,被噬菌体感染的细胞中大分子合成发生了戏剧性的改变:(a) RNA 的净积累在这些细胞中停止。[后来,这成为发现多种RNA 的基础,并且第一次证明了信使RNA 的存在]。(b) DNA 合成停止了7 分钟,随后又以5 倍至10 倍的速度恢复DNA 合成。(c)与此同时,蒙诺德(Monod)和沃尔曼(Wollman)的研究表明,噬菌体感染后一种细胞酶——可诱导β-半乳糖苷酶(galactosidase)的合成受到抑制。这些试验把病毒的潜伏期分为初期(在DNA 合成之前)和晚期两个阶段。更重要的是这些研究结果表明,病毒可能改变受感染细胞的大分子合成过程。

到1952 年底,两项试验对这个领域产生了重要影响。首先,赫尔希和蔡斯利用标记病毒蛋白(SO)和核酸(PO)跟踪噬菌体对细菌的附着。他们能用搅拌机去除病毒的蛋白质衣壳,只保留与受感染细胞有联系的DNA 。这使他们能够证明这种DNA 具有再生大量新病毒所需的全部信息。赫尔希-蔡斯的试验和沃森与克里克一年后阐述的新DNA 结构共同构成了分子生物学革命的奠基石。

病毒学领域的第二项试验是1953年由怀亚特(G.R.Wyatt)和科恩(S.S.Cohen)进行的。他们在研究T-偶数噬菌体时发现一个新的碱基,即5‘羟甲基胞嘧啶(hydroxymethylcytosine)。这个新发现的碱基似乎取代了细菌DNA 中的胞嘧啶(cytosine )。这使科学家们开始对细菌和受噬菌体感染的细胞中DNA 的合成进行了长达10 年的研究。最关键的研究表明,病毒把遗传信息引入受感染的细胞中。到1964 年,马修斯(Mathews)等人的研究证明,未受感染的细胞中不存在5‘羟甲基胞嘧啶,并且必须由病毒为之编码。这些试验提出了脱氧嘧啶(deoxypyrimidine)生物合成和DNA 复制方面的早期酶学概念,提供的明确的生物化学证据表明可以编码一种新的信息并在受感染的细胞中表达。对这些噬菌体的详细遗传分析后确认了编码这些噬菌体蛋白质的基因,并绘制了基因图使概念更完整。实际上,对T-偶数噬菌体的rⅡ 和B 顺反子(cistron )的遗传分析成为研究最充分的“遗传精细结构”之一。利用噬菌体变异株和提取物体外复制病毒DNA ,对我们当代了解DNA 如何自我复制作出了重要贡献。最后,通过对噬菌体装配的详细遗传学分析,利用噬菌体突变株体外装配的互补性阐明了有机体如何利用自我装配的原理构建复杂结构。对噬菌体溶菌酶的遗传和生物化学分析有助于阐述突变的分子性质,噬菌体突变(琥珀突变)提供了在分子水平研究第二位点抑制突变(second-site suppressor mutation)的明确方式 。DNA的环形排列、末尾冗余(引起噬菌体杂合体)结构可以解释T 偶数噬菌体的环形遗传图。

病毒和细胞蛋白质的合成在受噬菌体感染的细胞中发生明显变化,这一点是在早期研究中使用十二烷基硫酸钠一聚丙烯酰胺凝胶(sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)-polyacrylamide gels)而被戏剧性地发现,结果表明病毒蛋白质的合成有特定顺序,分为早期蛋白质和晚期蛋白质。这种一过性的基本调节机制最终发现了调节RNA 聚合酶和授予基因特殊性的∑因子。几乎每一个级别的基因调节(转录、RNA 稳定性、蛋白合成、蛋白处理)的研究均是通过对噬菌体感染性研究得出的原始数据揭示的。

虽然溶菌噬菌体(lytic phage)研究取得如此显着的进展,但是仍然没有人能清楚地解释溶源性噬菌体(lysogenic phage)。这种局面在1949年发生了变化,当时,巴斯德研究所的安德烈• 勒沃夫(Andre Lwoff) 开始对Bacillus megaterium 及其溶源性噬菌体进行研究。通过使用一种显微操纵器将单一细菌分割多达19 次,从未释放出任何病毒。当从外部对溶源性细菌进行溶解时,也没有发现病毒。但是经常出现一个细菌自发地发生溶解并释放出许多病毒来的现象。紫外线能诱使这些病毒释放是一项重要的发现,这种观察可以概述一种病毒与其宿主之间的奇妙关系。到1954 年,巴斯德研究所的雅各布( Jacob)和沃尔曼(Wollman )得出重要的研究结果,即一种溶源性菌株(Hfr ,λ)与非溶源性受体在结合之后的遗传杂交(genetic cross )导致病毒的诱发。他们把这个过程称为合子诱导(zygotic induction )。事实上溶源性噬菌体或称原噬菌体(prophage)在其宿主大肠杆菌的染色体中的位置,可在遗传杂交之后用标准的中断交尾实验绘图。这是在概念上了解溶源性病毒的最关键试验之一,理由如下:( a )病毒的行为就像一种细菌的染色体上的细菌基因一样;( b )它表明病毒遗传物质由于负面的调节而在病毒中保持静止的试验结果之一。当染色体从溶源性供体细菌传递到非溶源性受体宿主时,该病毒遗传物质丢失;( c )这有助于解释雅各布和沃尔曼早在1954 年就认识到的酶合成以及噬菌体生成的诱导是同一现象的表现”。这些试验为操纵子模型(operon model )和协同基因调控(coordinate gene regulation)的性质奠定了基础。

虽然在1953 年阐述了DNA 的结构 , 1954 年描述了合子诱导,但是溶源现象中细菌染色体与病毒染色体之间的关系仍被称为附着部位(attachment site ) ,当时也只能从这些角度考虑。后来,坎贝尔(Campbell)根据噬菌体标记的顺序在整合状态下不同于复制或生长状态这一事实,提出DNA 与细菌染色体进行λ整合的模型,至此,病毒与其宿主之间的真正密切关系才得到认识。这导致分离出λ噬菌体的负调节基因或称抑制基因,这是对溶原菌免疫特性的清楚了解,也是对基因如何进行协同调节的早期范例之一。对λ噬菌体生命周期的遗传分析是微生物遗传学领域的重大学术探险。它值得所有分子病毒学和生物学学者进行详细的研究。

诸如鼠伤寒沙门氏菌(Salmonella typhimurium)P22 这样的溶源性噬菌体是一般性转导(transduction ) 的第一个例证,而λ噬菌体是特殊转导的第一个例证。病毒可能携带细胞基因,并把这样的基因从一个细胞转移到另一个细胞,这不仅提供了精确遗传绘图的一种方法,而且也是病毒学中的一个新概念。随着细菌的遗传因素被更详细地研究,可以清楚地看出,从溶源性噬菌体研究发展到附加体( episome)、转座子(transposon)、反转录转座子(retrotranspon )、插入元件(insertion element )、逆转录病毒(retrovirus)、嗜肝DNA 病毒(hepadnovirus )、类病毒(viroid )、拟病毒(virusoid ,又称类病毒viroid-like指一类包裹在植物病毒颗粒中的病毒,译者注),以及朊病毒(prion )研究,这一切使得遗传信息在病毒与其宿主之间的定义和分类的关系开始变得模糊不清。从噬菌体研究中得出的遗传和生化概念使病毒学的进一步发展成为可能。溶菌和溶源性噬菌体研究的经验和教训常常随着对动物病毒的研究而被人们重新学习和修改。

细菌防御方法

细菌防御噬菌体的主要方法是合成能够降解外来DNA的酶。这些酶被称为限制性内切酶,它们能够剪切噬菌体注入细菌细胞的病毒DNA。细菌还含有另一个防御系统,这一系统利用CRISPR序列来保留其过去曾经遇到过的病毒的基因组片段,从而使得它们能够通过RNA干扰的方式来阻断病毒的复制。这种遗传系统为细菌提供了一个类似于获得性免疫的机制来对抗病毒感染。

应用

作为分子生物学研究的试验工具

噬菌体是遗传调控、复制、转录与翻译等方面的生物学基础研究和基因工程中的重要材料或工具。遗传学中的转导作用就是以噬菌体作为媒介,在2株细菌间传递遗传物质。

用于细菌的鉴定和分型

噬菌体只能侵染相应的细菌,具有高度的特异性,可用于细菌鉴定。同时,噬菌体具有型的特异性,可对细菌进行分型鉴定。可以利用噬菌体对沙门氏菌、大肠杆菌和伤寒菌等进行分型。

噬茵体展示技术和噬菌体抗体库v

噬菌体展示技术是一种强有力的基因表达筛选技术,1985年首次由美国科学家SmithMl在(Science))杂志进行了阐述。噬菌体展示技术的基本原理是将外源蛋白的基因克隆到噬菌体的基因组DNA中,从而在噬菌体的表面表达特定的外源蛋白。Ellis SEp等指出利用噬菌体展示多肽库可以筛选和确定线虫疫苗的抗原,这是疫苗抗原鉴定的一种新方法。近年来随着流行性病毒引起的疾病逐渐增加,抗病毒多肽被认为是预防和治疗疾病极有希望的方法。Castel G等指出噬菌体展示技术特异性表达的重组多肽可以应用到抗病毒研究及药物开发中。

在噬菌体展示技术及PCR克隆技术基础上,英国科学家Winter等率先在(Nature))杂志上发表文章阐述噬菌体抗体库技术。该技术是将抗体重链和轻链可变区基因与噬菌体的外壳蛋白基因重组,将抗体片段Fab或scFv与噬菌体外壳蛋白以融合蛋白的形式展示于噬菌体颗粒表面,进而快速高效筛选并富集针对某种抗原的特异性抗体,从根本上改变了传统的单抗制备流程。Krishnaswamy等利用噬菌体抗体库技术筛选到抗白色念珠菌HM一1杀伤毒素的scFv—C1阳性噬菌体抗体,该噬菌体抗体比单克隆抗体结合抗原的特异性高60倍。刑佑尚等报道了噬菌体抗体库技术在生物寄生虫检测、病毒检测、转基因产品检测、药物残留检测等领域的应用,指出此技术在检验检疫领域具有天然的契合优势和光明的前景。噬菌体抗体库技术必将成为抗体生产的主要技术,将给人类在疾病诊断、肿瘤研究、自身免疫性疾病研究、基因治疗、疾病防治和发病机制等方面带来极为广阔的前景。

用于检测和控制致病菌

食品和环境中存在许多致病菌,研究表明噬菌体能够检测和控制食品和环境中致病菌及腐败菌的生长。Bmvko LYu等讨论了噬菌体检测致病菌的优缺点,指出利用噬菌体检测食品安全及加工制造过程等方面存在的致病菌具有极大的应用前景。姜琴等指出利用噬菌体可以实时、快速而准确地检测食品中的沙门氏菌,在公共和食品卫生、畜牧兽医和121岸检疫中具有重要的意义。刘心妍认为噬菌体不仅可用于检测食源性致病菌,还可以应用在原料采集环节杀灭病原菌、生产或加工环节对设备等进行消毒、延长食品储藏期、消毒新鲜水果蔬菜等方面。

噬菌体疗法在各领域中的应用

噬菌体在宿主细胞中生长繁殖,能够引起致病菌的裂解,降低致病菌的密度,从而减少或避免致病菌感染或发病的机会,达到治疗和预防疾病的目的,即噬菌体疗法¨“。此疗法已广泛应用于兽医、农业和食品微生物学等领域。

(1)噬菌体疗法在畜牧业中的应用

国内养殖业尤其是养鸡业常常受到畜禽肠道腹泻病的困扰,此病主要是由大肠杆菌、沙门氏菌等致病微生物引起。随着耐药性细菌的大量出现,用具有专一性强、不易产生抗性等优点的相关噬菌体来治疗细菌疾病受到重视。Smith和Barrow等利用噬菌体疗法可以降低羊羔、仔猪和雏鸡患大肠杆菌肠道疾病的机率。 [1]

(2)噬菌体疗法在水产养殖中的应用

爆发性疾病的频繁发生给水产养殖业造成巨大的经济损失,细菌性疾病噬菌体疗法在水产养殖业具有良好的应用前景。Park等在治疗Pseudomonas plecoghssicida等病菌引起的细菌性血型腹水感染时,通过喂食含噬菌体的食物可以有效清除致病细菌。 [2]

(3)噬菌体疗法在治疗人类疾病中的应用

噬菌体疗法首先在人类疾病治疗中得到应用。1921年,Bruynoghe和Maisin率先用噬菌体制剂治疗葡萄球菌引起的皮肤感染。此后噬菌体广泛应用于耳喉科、口腔科、眼科、皮肤科、儿科及肺部疾病等的治疗。随着抗生素的出现,噬菌体疗法被渐渐忽视。Kutter 等报道噬菌体疗法治疗或预防人类疾病具有极大的潜力,指出通过实践和试验等方法最终使噬菌体疗法商业化是避免此疗法被忽视的关键。随着细菌抗生素耐药性的广泛存在,在许多领域使用噬菌体控制致病菌的生长和扩增。噬菌体治疗能够避免肠道菌群失衡,保持机体的正常免疫力,被认为是替代抗生素的一种安全、有效和有潜力的微生态制剂忸。

参考资料

1. 宋亚雄, 王丽丽, 李晓宇, 张建城, 李振, 张楠, 李淑英, 徐永平 - 《动物医学进展》 2016年3期 .万方[引用日期2017-12-14]

2. 陈晓春, 王继文, 曹永长, 毕英佐, 马静云 - 《动物医学进展》 2005年1期 .万方[引用日期2017-12-14]

Next Prev Menu